Curious

“Why, hello there, sir!
You seem a lover-ly sir!
Such a lover-ly sir!
Do you have some peanuts?”

That’s what I said to the sir. He had no peanuts to give me. He just looked at me through a big, black eye that made a funny noise when it blinked.

CRICK!

Like a snappin’ twig! CRICK!

The sir didn’t scare me, no no no! My mother always said one should be scared of sirs, but he was a NICE sir. A lover-ly sir! All peanuts and fruit and lover-ly! Mother would be proud o’ him if he was a one of ussems, but he wasn’t an ussems. He was a sir, but no barky-barkys here. No string-falls, no trap, no trap. Not this sir!

Like I told you, told you, told you again! He was a lover-ly sir!

He smelled like he would have peanuts.

*****

Image is “Tame Squirrel” by Jerry Cooke.

Trapdoor

What are you doing at my door?
Tresssssspassssser!
Somebody ought to tell you
That it’s polite to knock.
But using of fangs is always such a rude gesture…
Somebody should tell them it’s just how I say ‘hello’
When I invite my little crrrrritters
In for our dinner parrrrrrty.

You with your big, round eye
I see you with all of mine
Hsssssssssss!
Away! Away!
You big black creature blocking the ssssssun!

BE
GONE
AWAY
AWAY
AWAY

Ssssssscrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Image is “Hello Red Eyes…” by Fanoom

How YOU Doin’?

I found a note on my iPod today. I didn’t write it. It was dated Monday 4th July 2011 at 8.14am. It said:

D8? P

So it seems I’m the world’s most awesome subconscious typist (seriously, it would have taken turning on my iPod in my bag, opening the ‘Notes’ app, phasing between alphabet and number screens AND being coherent, albeit in text speak, all while being on the bus to work)…

That, or my pocket’s trying to chat me up.

A Refle(x)ction

I thought about you tonight. Felt like the first time in years.

I was waiting for a bus, kicking the dead leaves of June, like a child in red gumboots. I could feel the eyes of my soon-to-be fellow travellers, all staring at me, asking, “Why? She should be more mature than this! She is wearing lipstick, and has a handbag and has wine in her shopping!” But I didn’t care. I had to pass the time somehow.

Then I remembered you. I remembered how you held my hand to stop me chasing seagulls. I remembered how you got angry about taxes you didn’t have to pay yet, and talked about marriage like it was a matter of fact.

Like we’d picked a date.

Like you’d even asked.

Like I’d have considered if you did.

I was sixteen, back then. You were three years older. It feels like an age ago. It almost is.

But we both moved on along our respective paths. You found a wife and a new land. I found my own adventures, and what adventures they have been.

I’m older now than you were then. And I still kick the leaves. And I still chase pigeons and seagulls. And I still dance in bus shelters for no reason at all, where everyone can see me.

And whenever I do, and that memory of you creeps back into my head, I just softly smile and think the same damn thing.

“Thank Christ I dodged that bullet.”

Because to live the life you wanted for me would have killed me.

Persuading Bob – an idea for my fellow progressives…

It’s very easy for me to say this, what with being a heterosexual cis woman, but watching Bob Katter last night on Q & A really concreted my feelings about marriage equality and how we should be persuading people that it’s the right thing to do.

I can’t say for certain that what I’m about to say will be popular, and there will undoubtedly be those who say I’m attacking the cause. I’m not. The sooner we can all marry the human being we choose (well, we have to draw a line somewhere), the better.

There have been plenty of people willing to call out Katter as a homophobic, sexist, racist ranter and raver in a hat. Watching him last night, I saw something completely different. I saw a man with passion for every Australians rights, a true love for his country who has trouble supporting things he doesn’t understand. His speaking out against the Intervention was inspiring, and I must admit, not what I was expecting. His policy on giving title deeds to land held under native title is one that really knocked the air out of me – a fantastic idea, if he can pull it off, but again, one that totally caught me off my guard.

But it was that passion for the equal rights of the First Australians that really made me come to think that perhaps there’s more to this mad Akubra wearing fellow from Queensland than any of us are comfortable admitting.

His apparent rejection of climate change (it was at that point that my live streaming started cutting in and out, so I missed most of that exchange) seems to come down to a lack of understanding. And why would you want to, when everyone surrounding the issue continues to consider those who don’t support it to be absolute knuckleheads?

There is a massively patronising stance that so many of us with ‘progressive’ political stances take, whether we choose to acknowledge it or not. The fact of the matter is that people have gone through thought processes to get to their conclusions. We have to acknowledge and accept that, rather than battering them with “OMG! YOU ARE SO TOTALLY WRONG! WHY CANT YOU SEE WHY YOU’RE SO WRONG?!”

Really, we need to start using our empathy skills to persuade. You can’t fix something if you don’t know why it’s not working in the first place. And to tell people that they’re idiots for not believing what we believe in, even if it does have a basis in science or economics, gets us nowhere. Because (here’s the funny bit) PEOPLE DON’T LIKE BEING CALLED IDIOTS. It only makes them hate the people telling them they are, and therefore hate whatever it is they’re trying to persuade them to think.

So here’s an idea. Next time you come across someone, like Katter, who doesn’t agree with what you think, talk it through. Discuss it. Be passionate, but not overly so. Listen to why they have come to their conclusion, and if you can, rebut it after they’ve said their piece. Don’t get frustrated and call them ‘stupid’, or even insinuate that they are. Talk to them on their terms, not your own.

If I could speak to Mr Katter about marriage equality, I would. I’d ask why he thinks it’s not a valid policy option. I’d ask him to think about all the jobs that could be generated across a huge number of industries by the permission of marriage for the entire LGBTI community. (Heck, let’s just say the entire human race, shall we? No need for labels.) I’d tell him about my friends, who are in some of the longest relationships I’ve come across in my short life. I’d ask, “If it was such a big thing, and homosexuality is such a sin, why didn’t Jesus say something about it?” I’d offer to introduce him to people with their own stories of discrimination because of who they’d fallen in love with, just like the First Australians have encountered discrimination for the colour of their skin.

But if he still refused to agree, I’d be okay with that. At least I’d have said my piece, and I’d know I’d have left him with something to think about in relation to the terms of his own party.

He might even teach me a thing or two, because let’s face it, I’m young and passionate and don’t understand the whole world yet, and never will.

Sure, sometimes you can’t change the way people think about the world. But if you try, and that change doesn’t occur, it doesn’t make them a horrible human being. There’s no need for aggression or making fun or being a dick to them.

As my grandmother says, ‘You’ll catch more flies with honey than vinegar.’

Best of COM340 – Osama Bin Later

Adios Osama!

Well, he always said he wanted to go out with a BANG!

Undoubtedly, the biggest story of the last 12 months has been the capture and killing of the World’s Most Wanted Man, Hide & Seek Champion and All Round Bad Guy, Mr Osama Bin Laden on May 2nd, 2011.

Unlike many of my friends, who heard about it on Twitter, I first heard about Bin Laden’s death on the front page of Google News. The story had only been out about 20 mins, but there were plenty of people reporting it, even though Barack Obama had not yet made his speech to confirm it. It was immediately the talk of the office, with plenty of theories being thrown around. Google’s news feed had the story even before the radio station I was working at had it. (They networked their national news from Sydney, but it hadn’t even come over the air yet.) The speed with which the story hit the front of one of the biggest compilers of online news in the world is mind-blowing, especially when you think that less than a century ago, people would have had to wait at least 24 hours for it to be in the newspaper if it was a local story, possibly weeks or months if the information was coming from overseas.

Unfortunately, due to the fact that I was at work, I was unable to monitor the spread of the news through social media in the way that I had with other major passings, like Michael Jackson back in 2009, but the snippets I did manage to get were astounding. It felt like the whole world was waiting for 1pm AEST, when Obama finally confirmed the death of the World’s Most Wanted Man.

But the death of Bin Laden wasn’t the only thing to celebrate that day. Oh no, there was a new beginning stirring in the meme-melting pot of the internet.

You know the photo I’m talking about. It’s this one:

It’s a pretty awesome photo. It’s certainly one that is going to help define that day in history for the entire world, forever. And they all look so remarkably TENSE. It’s just a perfect representation of what it must have been like, knowing what was happening.

You can’t really improve on it, can you?

Well, the meme-machine did its very best. Here are some of my personal favourites. Unfortunately, due to the nature of posting and reposting, all of the authors of these photo manipulations are unknown.

Taken from The Mary Sue.

Kicking it Royal Wedding style…

Lego makes it all alright… Image by Alex Eylar.

Oh Jersey Shore. I’m really glad I don’t watch you.
The Situation Room feat. The Situation

When memes meet memes…

Absolute WINNER!

And then just to finish it off, something everyone loves – sticking it to Donald Trump. Take it away, Mr Obama.

Damn straight!

Best of COM340 – Google: friend or foe to social media?

Google is our friend. They let us search the internet, look after email for us, give us the opportunity to edit documents with our friends and colleagues anywhere in the world in real time, they give us memes on YouTube, they host our blogs, they give us location based information and recommendations, maps, satellite images… There isn’t much they CAN’T do.

Except decide what it is we read and view on the internet, right?

Well, it might surprise you just how wrong that idea truly is.

To get a good idea of just how much power Google has over what you see online, take a look at this talk from Eli Pariser about the concept of a ‘filter bubble’ – how websites like Facebook and Google tailor your search results and your news feeds to suit what they think you’ll want to read.

I have to say, the comparison between the two different users and their Google results is pretty astonishing. I’ve personally noticed that Google on my work computer already knows to look for Canberra based options when I search for a kind of business. I must admit, I really don’t like that, especially since this week I had all my server details and personal computer settings changed over to a new account. Google still knows where I am, and what I’m likely to search for.

As you can see, this is SO much bigger than social media. Sure, the idea that your new boss can type your name into Google and find every single embarrassing photo ever posted of you on the web is terrifying. The idea that we may not hear about bad things in the world? It’s probably not so big a deal to us right now.

But the fact is that it’s a kind of censorship. With Google having control of so much of our online experience is it really that big a leap to them dictating what we will do in our every day lives? Their CEO Eric Schmidt doesn’t seem to think so. (Also, take a look at this one. This guy’s a bit creepy!)

So, with social media being seen and desired by many as a place where we can choose our own online destinies, especially given its importance in protests in places like Iran and Egypt in recent years, Google is most certainly a foe, but not the only enemy freedom of information and freedom of speech face on the online battlefield.

*****

And as a little PS: here’s the Google Hungry Beast File from 2010. Yes, it’s being hosted by YouTube, a Google company. (You seriously can’t escape these guys!)

Return of the Senator’s Press Release

Guess who’s back, sending me a bucket load of irrelevant e-mails!

*****

Hi,

Senator Queensland thought you may be interested in this press release it is a response to the Comments Wayne Swan made today on the Carbon tax.

Regards

PR Man

*****

Hi PR Man,

Funnily enough, I’m not interested.

Also, your misuse of capital letters and punctuation makes me a little bit sad.

Kind regards,

Noni Doll

Media Releases and Relevance = KIND OF IMPORTANT

In my job, I sometimes get really stupidly irrelevant media releases. The most stupidly irrelevant of these releases tend to come from a certain Federal Queensland Senator.

My personal (almost 100% conflicting) political views aside, if a media release is relevant to our audience, I pass it on to the news department or one of our announcers. If, like this one, it is SO BLATANTLY IRRELEVANT I WANT TO STAB MYSELF WITH A SPOON, I usually just delete it.

But when you get two or more of these ridiculously pointless e-mails a day, AND you don’t agree with the person’s politics, these are the kind of e-mails I want to send back. The bit in black is what I *would* send. The white bit (highlight the entire text to see it) is what I *want* to send, but have decided they can find via Google Alerts instead.

All copyright in the release below belongs to the Senator in question, but I’m sure he won’t mind me using it. It’s free publicity after all.

Enjoy.


*********************************

PRESS RELEASE
 

A certain Nationals Federal Queensland Senator thought this media release would be of interest to you.

13th April 2011

$20 million – not enough

Senator Queensland today promised the Labor Government “the mother of all campaigns” in every coastal seat in Australia over the government’s looming plans for massive marine reserves.

A story leaked to the Fairfax press this week “as a toe in the water” suggests the Government has set aside $20 million to compensate professional fishermen for fishing bans in the vast South-West Bioregion, stretching from the Fleurieu Peninsular in South Australia to north of Perth in Western Australia.

“What the Government needs to understand is that the people who are telling them that $20 million will be adequate are the people who advised the previous government that a handful of millions would compensate for fishing bans associated with the rezoning of the Great Barrier Reef marine Park in 2004.

“That bill reached over $220 million.”

Senator Queensland said professional and recreational fishermen needed to contradict a claim in the government’s leaked outline of the South-West constraints that reaction from fishing interests to the plans would be “muted.”

“I personally give an iron-clad guarantee the response will not be muted,” Senator Queensland said.

“This fight will be carried into every coastal seat in the country with a determination and a vigour that will unseat any Labor member within coo-ee of the coast, and deny Labor any chance of winning many more.

“The government is planning to use fishermen as a sop to the Greens, who are demanding that vast areas of Australia’s Exclusive Economic Zone be locked up.

“The Labor government in South Australia is already engaging in complementary zoning, ahead of the federal announcement, in ways that suggests what’s coming will play to the greens.

“There was also a hint in the story that there will be very strong protection for the Coral Sea, which is again in line with formal demands of the Greens.

“A tough anti-fishing regime in the South-West, followed by big constraints in the Coral Sea, will be the political obituary for any Labor politician in any coastal seat in every state and territory.”

ENDS

***************

Hi,

Would you please inform Senator Queensland that this media release was not relevant to either 2DU or Zoo FM, as our station is not on the coast. We are, in fact, five to six hours inland.

Also, we are not in Queensland, or any of the states mentioned directly in the release.

Finally, our local member, Mark Coulton, and all the Federal members in our broad listening area, are National Party representatives. As we have no Labor party representatives, the note of their unseating is completely pointless.

Thanks for your time. Please stop wasting mine.

Kind regards,

Noni Doll
Reception